Precursors to theories of mind in nonhuman brains

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):131-132 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Heyes is right that behavioural tests able to distinguish mentalistic from nonmentalistic alternatives should be sought, but the theoretical issue is less about the passing of behavioural tests than it is about the internal mechanisms which allow the passing of the tests. It may be helpful to try to assess the internal mechanisms directly by measuring brain activities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What can we learn from the absence of evidence?Thomas R. Zentall - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):133-134.
Theory of mind in nonhuman primates: A question of language?Colin Gray & Phil Russell - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):121-121.
Theory of mind in nonhuman primates.C. M. Heyes - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):101-114.
Our brains are not us.Walter Glannon - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (6):321-329.
The prior question: Do human primates have a theory of mind?Robert M. Gordon - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):120-121.
Seeing is not (necessarily) believing.Virginia Slaughter & Linda Mealey - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):130-130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
24 (#642,030)

6 months
16 (#149,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references