Learning Versus Evolution: From Biology to Game Theory

Biological Theory 6 (4):311-319 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two main schemes explain how a system adapts to its environment. Evolutionary models are grounded on three usual processes (variation, transmission, selection) acting at the population level. Learning models are concerned with the endogenous search for a better performance at the individual level. The first ones were initially favored by biology and the second well illustrated by game theory. The article examines first how game theory went to evolution and how biology later considered learning. It shows some examples of a hybrid use of models of each type. It finally proposes a common framework for both types of models.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evolution, learning, games, and simple heuristics.Peter Hammerstein - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):752-753.
Maynard Smith, optimization, and evolution.Sahotra Sarkar - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (5):951-966.
Modeling rationality, morality, and evolution.Peter Danielson (ed.) - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy of Biology.Elliott Sober - 1993 - Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
The logic of strategy.Cristina Bicchieri, Richard C. Jeffrey & Brian Skyrms (eds.) - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Modeling social and evolutionary games.Angela Potochnik - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):202-208.
Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction.Ken Binmore - 2007 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
37 (#409,683)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?