Introduction: Special Issue on Charles Hamblin

Informal Logic 31 (4):279-304 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is unfortunate that Hamblin’s contributions do not get him the credit he deserves for his remarkable achievements. Although his contributions to philosophy are well enough recognized, and his early contributions to computing have been acknowledged, it seems strange that his work has not been widely enough recognized for the interdisciplinary effect it has had. There has been a feedback loop whereby his theories on formal dialogue systems and imperatives were taken up in argumentation, applied in computing, and then used in this form to refine argumentation methods

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Hamblin’s Book Fallacies was About.Jim Mackenzie - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):262-278.
The Coherence of Hamblin’s Fallacies.Ralph Johnson - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):305-317.
Topical Roots of Formal Dialectic.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):71-87.
A Formal Characterisation of Hamblin’s Action-State Semantics.Chris Reed & Timothy J. Norman - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (4):415 - 448.
Hamblin on the Standard Treatment of Fallacies.Douglas N. Walton - 1991 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 24 (4):353 - 361.
Acceptance Is Not Enough: A Critique of Hamblin.Ralph H. Johnson - 1990 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 23 (4):271 - 287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-19

Downloads
57 (#274,471)

6 months
34 (#99,112)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas Walton
Last affiliation: University of Windsor

Citations of this work

Being Reasonable.David Botting - 2015 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 42 (1):17-36.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references