Dialogic Consensus in Medicine—A Justification Claim

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44 (1):71-84 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The historical emphasis of medical ethics, based on substantive frameworks and principles derived from them, is no longer seen as sufficiently sensitive to the moral pluralism characteristic of our current era. We argue that moral decision-making in clinical situations is more properly derived from a process of dialogic consensus. This process entails an inclusive, noncoercive, and self-reflective dialogue within the community affected. In order to justify this approach, we make two claims—the first epistemic, and the second normative. The epistemic claim follows from Habermas’ “ways” of knowing. We argue that the dialogue emanating from this episteme focuses on the relevant facts about the patient, as well as on the values attached to these facts, thus allowing facts and their meanings to serve as the basis for reflective action appropriate to the circumstances. The normative claim follows from Habermas’ discourse theory of morality and communicative action. It determines that clinical decision-making should be approached from the perspective of the actual reality of people in their situation of illness, set in their socio-cultural background, and hence be grounded in the second-person perspective. Relocating ethical decision-making from a monological space into one characterized by dialogue is especially appropriate to the clinical encounter.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,442

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dialogic Consensus In Clinical Decision-Making.Paul Walker & Terry Lovat - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (4):571-580.
Possibilities of consensus: Toward democratic moral discourse.Bruce Jennings - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):447-463.
Consensus and Cognitivism in Habermas's Discourse.Darrel Moellendorf - 2000 - South African Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):65-74.
Consensus and Cognitivism in Habermas's Discourse Ethics.Darrel Moellendorf - 2000 - South African Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):65-74.
Ethical case deliberation and decision making.Diego Gracia - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):227-233.
Moral Intuitions, Moral Facts, and Justification in Ethics.Stefan S. Sencerz - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-22

Downloads
31 (#379,658)

6 months
1 (#454,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?