Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (4):571-580 (2016)
AbstractThis paper is predicated on the understanding that clinical encounters between clinicians and patients should be seen primarily as inter-relations among persons and, as such, are necessarily moral encounters. It aims to relocate the discussion to be had in challenging medical decision-making situations, including, for example, as the end of life comes into view, onto a more robust moral philosophical footing than is currently commonplace. In our contemporary era, those making moral decisions must be cognizant of the existence of perspectives other than their own, and be attuned to the demands of inter-subjectivity. Applicable to clinical practice, we propose and justify a Habermasian approach as one useful means of achieving what can be described as dialogic consensus. The Habermasian approach builds around, first, his discourse theory of morality as universalizable to all and, second, communicative action as a cooperative search for truth. It is a concrete way to ground the discourse which must be held in complex medical decision-making situations, in its actual reality. Considerations about the theoretical underpinnings of the application of dialogic consensus to clinical practice, and potential difficulties, are explored.
Similar books and articles
Possibilities of consensus: Toward democratic moral discourse.Bruce Jennings - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):447-463.
Approaches to Clinical Ethical Decision-Making: Ethical Theory, Casuistry and Consultation.Paula Marjorie Chidwick - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Guelph (Canada)
Ethical and Clinical Issues in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Frail Elderly with Dementia: A Jewish Perspective.Michael Gordon - 2007 - Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 2:1-4.
Decision Analysis as a Basis for Medical Decision Making: The Tree of Hippocrates.D. A. Zarin & S. G. Pauker - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (2):181-214.
Casuistry and Practical Discourse on the Discourse Ethical Foundations of Medical Moral Education.Yuanze Lin - 2005 - Philosophy and Culture 32 (8):51-69.
A study of the foundations of ethical decision making of clinical medical ethicists.Donnie J. Self & Joy D. Skeel - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
Teaching clinical ethics as a professional skill: bridging the gap between knowledge about ethics and its use in clinical practice.C. Myser, I. H. Kerridge & K. R. Mitchell - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (2):97-103.
Clinical pragmatism: A method of moral problem solving.Joseph J. Fins, Matthew D. Bacchetta & Franklin G. Miller - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):129-143.
Best practices in clinical ethics consultation and decision-making.Louise M. Terry & Karen Sanders - 2011 - Clinical Ethics 6 (2):103-108.
The promises and perils of pragmatism: Commentary on Fins, Bacchetta, and Miller.Rosemarie Tong - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):147-152.
Clinical Decision-Making, Gender Bias, Virtue Epistemology, and Quality Healthcare.James A. Marcum - 2017 - Topoi 36 (3):501-508.
When four principles are too many: bloodgate, integrity and an action-guiding model of ethical decision making in clinical practice.William Muirhead - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (4):195-196.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Dialogic Consensus in Medicine—A Justification Claim.Paul Walker & Terence Lovat - 2019 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44 (1):71-84.
In Defence of Moral Pluralism and Compromise in Health Care Networks.Kasper Raus, Eric Mortier & Kristof Eeckloo - 2018 - Health Care Analysis 26 (4):362-379.
The Moral Authority of Consensus.Paul Walker & Terence Lovat - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (3):443-456.
Which Lane Should We Be In?Michael A. Ashby & Leigh E. Rich - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (4):461-465.
Communicative action and practical discourse to empower patients in healthcare-related decision making.Karolina Napiwodzka - 2021 - Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica 38:81-99.
References found in this work
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Jürgen Habermas (ed.) - 1996 - Polity.
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Frank I. Michelman & Jurgen Habermas - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (6):307.
Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.David M. Rasmussen - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):571.