Correcting ‘a notional’ confusion for critical discourse analysis

Journal of Critical Realism 22 (1):1-6 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The meaning and grammatical status of ‘a notional’ in the schema for critical discourse analysis (CDA) from Bhaskar’s posthumously published Enlightened Common Sense (2016) is somewhat ambiguous. An ambiguity that has persisted through a subsequent development of the schema. Following the publication of Bhaskar’s original manuscript, it can now be seen that erroneous grammatical changes were made to the manuscript during the publication process. The original version provides a more coherent schema for CDA. This paper discusses the implications of the original version coming to light. This shows that Bhaskar created a more coherent schema for CDA than the published version indicated. Clarifying the meaning and grammatical status of ‘a notional’ in Bhaskar’s schema for CDA and a schema that was subsequently derived from it is an important corrective for future critical realist critical discourse analysts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral evaluation in critical discourse analysis.Theo van Leeuwen - 2018 - Critical Discourse Studies 15 (2):140-153.
Presupposition in discourse.Alexandra Polyzou - 2015 - Critical Discourse Studies 12 (2):123-138.
The critical analysis of musical discourse.Theo van Leeuwen - 2012 - Critical Discourse Studies 9 (4):319-328.
Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis.Igor Žagar - 2010 - Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6 (1):3-27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-10

Downloads
2 (#1,787,337)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?