Classical and Neoclassical Cosmology: A Neoclassical Response to the Haugen-Keeling-Hartshorne Discussion and Stephen Hawking’s "No Boundary Proposal"

Process Studies 35 (2):270-290 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hartshorne’s Neoclassical Theism and Black Theology. Walkre - 1989 - Process Studies 18 (4):240-258.
Models of man: Neoclassical, behavioural, and evolutionary.Dennis C. Mueller - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):59-76.
Neoclassical Concepts.Derek Leben - 2015 - Mind and Language 30 (1):44-69.
Situational analysis beyond neoclassical economists.Lawrence A. Boland - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (4):515-521.
Hartshorne and neoclassical metaphysics.Eugene Herbert Peters - 1970 - Lincoln,: University of Nebraska Press.
Hartshorne’s Response.Charles Hartshorne & L. Bryant Keeling - 1993 - Process Studies 22 (3):172-172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
34 (#445,975)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references