Argumentation 26 (3):369-391 (2012)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
Abstract This paper addresses the role that argumentation schemes and argument visualization software tools can play in helping to find and counter objections to a given argument one is confronted with. Based on extensive analysis of features of the argumentation in these two examples, a practical four-step method of finding objections to an argument is set out. The study also applies the Carneades Argumentation System to the task of finding objections to an argument, and shows how this system has some capabilities that are especially useful. Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-23 DOI 10.1007/s10503-012-9261-z Authors Douglas Walton, Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric (CRRAR), University of Windsor, 2500 University Ave. W., Windsor, ON N9B 3Y1, Canada Journal Argumentation Online ISSN 1572-8374 Print ISSN 0920-427X
|
| Keywords | Argumentation schemes Proleptic argumentation Argument invention Critical questions Rebuttal Refutation Argument visualization tools Argument from inconsistent commitment |
| Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10503-012-9261-z |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 71,464
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- dx.doi.org (no proxy)
- link.springer.com (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [2] (no proxy)
- papers.ssrn.com
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning.Douglas Neil Walton & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1995 - Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.
Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Christopher Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
View all 13 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Towards Formal Representation and Evaluation of Arguments.Marcin Selinger - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (3):379-393.
Argumentation and Inference: A Unified Approach.Christophe Fouqueré & Myriam Quatrini - 2013 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 8 (1).
Motivated Doubts: A Comment on Walton's Theory of Criticism.Jan Albert van Laar - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):221-230.
Similar books and articles
Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton & Giovanni Sartor - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):111-142.
Words and Images in Argumentation.Axel Arturo Barceló Aspeitia - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):355-368.
Bermejo-Luque, Lilian. Giving Reasons. A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory: Springer, Argumentation Library, Dordrecht, 2011, Volume 20, 209 Pp.C. Andone - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):291-296.
David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (Eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. [REVIEW]Lester C. van der Pluijm & Jacky C. Visser - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):527-539.
Henrique Jales Ribeiro (Ed.): Rhetoric and Argumentation in the Beginning of the XXIst Century . Coimbra University Press, Coimbra, 2009, 312 Pp. [REVIEW]C. Andone - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):513-518.
Review of Harald Wohlrapp’s “Der Begriff des Arguments”. [REVIEW]Michael J. Hoppmann - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):297-304.
Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument.D. N. Walton - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (3):359-368.
Introduction: Special Issue on Argumentation in Education in Scandinavia and England. [REVIEW]Richard Andrews & Frøydis Hertzberg - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (4):433-436.
Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Walton's Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development. [REVIEW]J. Anthony Blair - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (4):365-379.
Parmenides as Secret Hero. Gregor Betz’s Theorie Dialektischer Strukturen : Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt Am Main, 2010, 292 Pp, ISBN: 978-3-465-03629-6, EUR 49.00.Frank Zenker - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):513-525.
Jean Wagemans: Redelijkheid En Overredingskracht van Argumentatie. Een Historisch-Filosofische Studie Over de Combinatie van Het Dialectische En Het Retorische Perspectief Op Argumentatie in de Pragma-Dialectische Argumentatietheorie (Reasonableness and Persuasiveness of Argumentation. An Historical-Philosophical Study on the Combination of the Dialectical and Rhetorical Perspective on Argumentation in the Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory). [REVIEW]Paul Gillaerts - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):123-125.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-01-17
Total views
54 ( #212,250 of 2,520,778 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,509 of 2,520,778 )
2012-01-17
Total views
54 ( #212,250 of 2,520,778 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,509 of 2,520,778 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
