A problem for counterfactual sufficiency

Analysis 83 (3):527-535 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The consequence argument purports to show that determinism is true only if no one has free will. Judgments about whether the argument is sound depend on how one understands locutions of the form 'p and no one can render p false'. The main interpretation on offer appeals to counterfactual sufficiency: s can render p false just in case there is something s can do such that, were s to do it, p would be false; otherwise, s cannot render p false. Here I show that, in the context of the consequence argument, this interpretation conflicts with widely endorsed principles governing the logic of counterfactuals.

Similar books and articles

Can Counterfactuals Solve the Exclusion Problem?Lei Zhong - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (1):129-147.
Goodman and Parry on Counterfactual.Oswaldo Chateaubriand - 2011 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 15 (3):383–397.
Safety and the True–True Problem.Jeffrey W. Roland Jon Cogburn - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):246-267.
Safety and the True–True Problem.Jon Cogburn & Jeffrey W. Roland - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):246-267.
IV-Counterfactual Entailment.David Barnett - 2012 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (1pt1):73-97.
Counterfactual Overdetermination vs. the Causal Exclusion Problem.Georg Sparber - 2005 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 27 (3/4):479 - 490.
Walters on Conjunction Conditionalization.Arif Ahmed - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1):115-122.


Added to PP

373 (#54,938)

6 months
162 (#20,362)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John William Waldrop
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

An Essay on Free Will.Peter Van Inwagen - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 36 (3):602-605.
Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):341-344.
Are we free to break the laws?David Lewis - 1981 - Theoria 47 (3):113-21.

View all 25 references / Add more references