Abortion: For Whose Sake?

Hastings Center Report 6 (4):4-34 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abortion: for the fetus's own sake?Paul F. Camenisch - 1976 - Hastings Center Report 6 (2):38-41.
Abortion, embryonic stem cell research, and waste.David A. Jensen - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):27-41.
Is Abortion Murder?Michael Tooley & Laura Purdy - 1974 - In Robert L. Perkins (ed.), Abortion: Pro and Con. Rochester, Vermont: Schenkman. pp. 129–149.
Abortion, society, and the law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]: Press of Case Western Reserve University. Edited by J. Douglas Butler.
The moral significance of spontaneous abortion.T. F. Murphy - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (2):79-83.
The Relevance of Aristotle’s Notion of Equity for the Contemporary Abortion Debate.James M. Jacobs - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:119-132.
Chemical Abortion in Australia.Marcia Riordan - 2009 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 15 (2):6.
Abortion, Christianity, and Consistency.Richard Schoenig - 1998 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (1):32-37.
Is Abortion a Question of Personal Morality?Julie Kirsch - 2013 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):91-99.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
22 (#669,532)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laura Purdy
Wells College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references