A comment upon the ontological proof of the devil

Philosophical Studies 10 (4):49 - 50 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Do Descartes and st. Thomas agree on the ontological proof?John Edward Abbruzzese - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):413-435.
The ontological argument and the devil.Yujin Nagasawa - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):72-91.
On behalf of the devil: A parody of Anselm revisited.Timothy Chambers - 2000 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1):93–113.
Some weakened Gödelian ontological systems.Srećko Kovač - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (6):565-588.
The importance of cartesian triangles: A new look at Descartes's ontological argument.M. V. Dougherty - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):35 – 62.
Questioning Gödel's Ontological Proof: Is Truth Positive?Gregor Damschen - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):161-169.
The ontological proof of the devil.Robert J. Richman - 1958 - Philosophical Studies 9 (4):63 - 64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#409,683)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The devil and st. Anselm.Perry C. Mason - 1978 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (1):1 - 15.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references