A Commentary on Blute’s ‘Updated Definition’

Spontaneous Generations 2 (1):6 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Barely a decade after the discovery of the chromosomal basis of inheritance, and the articulation of the genetical theory of population change, the gene came to be widely regarded as the fundamental unit of biological organization. This is hardly surprising. The gene concept is a powerful one; it plays a unifying role in our understanding of evolution. Darwin told us that evolution by natural selection occurs in a population when organisms survive, die and reproduce differentially on account of their heritable form. This is a very schematic theory. It requires an account of the process of inheritance and also an account of the generation of phenotype. The gene concept plays a prominent role in explaining, and uniting, these phenomena. Genes are the units of inheritance; they are passed from parents to offspring in reproduction. Moreover, they are seen as units of phenotypic control. Evolutionary biologists often speak of the genome as a program for the production of an organism. Genes also became the elements of which populations are composed. Our best theory of population dynamics—inherited from Fisher, Haldane, and Wright—is a theory of changes in the relative frequencies of gene types. Genes are not just the principal causes of evolutionary change, they are also the units over which evolutionary change is defined and measured. So, at least, the orthodox reading of the Modern Synthesis theory of evolution would have us believe...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Professor Blute.Ian Hacking - 2009 - Spontaneous Generations 3 (1):226-228.
The evolution of replication.Marion Blute - 2007 - Biological Theory 2 (1):10-22.
Origins and the EcoEvoDevo Problem.Marion Blute - 2006 - Biological Theory 1 (2):116-118.
Hamilton: Heir of Darwin and Fisher?Marion Blute - 2014 - Biological Theory 9 (2):229-231.
Linear Läuchli semantics.R. F. Blute & P. J. Scott - 1996 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 77 (2):101-142.
Some counter-examples to page's notion of “localist”.Istvan S. N. Berkeley - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):470-471.
On the Definition of “Religion”.Phillip E. Devine - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):270-284.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-11

Downloads
11 (#1,105,752)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Denis Walsh
University of Toronto, St. George Campus