- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review
Problema 1:117-139 (2007)
Abstract
Constitutional Charters or Bill of Rights have been applauded because of the protection they provide to minorities and also in ensuring and protecting fundamental rights, however, Charters have been criticized for being considered morally and politically objectionable. The author responds to Charter critics most serious objections and offers some reasons for adopting an alternative framework.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review: The Living Tree.W. J. Waluchow - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
Una Teoria del Control Judicial de Constitucionalidad basada en el common law: Un Arbol vivo - Translation of A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review.Wilfrid J. Waluchow - 2009 - Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory.Grant Huscroft (ed.) - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Making Friends of Old Enemies: A Communitarian Defense of Judicial Review.John-Otto Phillips - 2010 - Gnosis 11 (1):1-15.
Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends.Wil Waluchow - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 18 (2):207-247.
Politician, Judges, and the Charter.L. Sumner - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 21 (1):227-238.
Waldron, Waluchow and the Merits of Constitutionalism.Joshua Mildenberger - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (1):71-90.
Judicial review and the protection of constitutional rights.Sadurski Wojciech - 2002 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (2):275-299.
Professor Waldron Goes to Canada (One More Time): The Canadian Charter and the Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty.Charles-Maxime Panaccio - 2010 - Common Law World Review 39:100.
Rights-based judicial review: A democratic justification. [REVIEW]Alon Harel - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):247-276.
Judicial Review Without Rights: Some Problems for the Democratic Legitimacy of Structural Judicial Review.Adrienne Stone - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (1):1-32.
Situating Legislated Rights: legislative and judicial role in contemporary constitutional theory.Lael K. Weis - 2020 - Jurisprudence 11 (4):621-631.
Weak-Form Judicial Review and American Exceptionalism.Rosalind Dixon - 2012 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32 (3):487-506.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-02-28
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2021-02-28
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Positivism, Legal Validity, and the Separation of Law and Morals.Giorgio Pino - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (2):190-217.
On the Puzzling Death of the Sanctity-of-Life Argument.Katharina Stevens - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (1):55-81.
Una defensa Del positivismo jurídico.Roberto M. Jiménez Cano - 2013 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 39:83-126.
Sobre the tapestry of reason: An inquiry into the nature of coherence and its role in legal argument, de amalia amaya.Juan Vega Gómez - 2017 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 46:131-218.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo