In Defense of Non-Natural Theistic Realism

Faith and Philosophy 27 (4):457-463 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Eric Wielenberg and I agree that basic moral truths are necessarily true. But Wielenberg thinks that, because these truths are necessary, they require no explanation, and I do not: some basic moral truths are not self-explanatory. I argue that Wielenberg’s reasons for thinking that my justification of that claim is inadequate are ultimately unconvincing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Value and Virtue in a Godless Universe.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Atheism and Morality.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2013 - In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press. pp. 89.
The price of non-reductive moral realism.Ralph Wedgwood - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):199-215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
84 (#193,846)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

God as self-explanatory.John Morreall - 1980 - Philosophical Quarterly 30 (120):206-214.

Add more references