What Actually Happened

[author unknown]
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):416-416 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ethics committee met and discussed the case with the surgeon. Just prior to this, the bioethics committee at a nearby medical center received a referral for a similar case. That committee had already undertaken a thorough review of the literature and the legal proceedings involved in the Seattle Ashley case. The medical center committee agreed to share their findings and deliberations with the children’s hospital committee and sent two representatives to present their information. In addition, members of the children’s hospital committee had a conference call with the pediatric endocrinologist who had been involved with the case at the medical center.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Invoking the Law in Ethics Consultation.Bethany Spielman - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (4):457.
Disagreement, consensus, and moral integrity.Ruth Macklin - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):289-311.
Institutional Review Boards, Worldwide.Jayapul Azariah - 2009 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 19 (2):35-41.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
2 (#1,780,599)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Necessity of Historicism.Frank Ankersmit - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2):226-240.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references