Ga $$\dot n$$ $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} $$ $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} $$ $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} $$ na of VY?PTI [Book Review]
Journal of Indian Philosophy 23 (3):273-294 (1995)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Śankara's views onyoga in thebrahmasūtrabhā $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} $}}{s} " />ya in the light of the authorship of theyogasūtrabhā $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} $}}{s} " />ya-vivara $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} $}}{n} " />a. [REVIEW]T. S. Rukmani - 1993 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 21 (4).
Intention and suggestion in the Abhidharmakśa: sandhābhā $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}$$ ārevisited. [REVIEW]Michael M. Broido - 1985 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 13 (4):327-381.
Gadādhara bha $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}$}}{t} " /> $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}$}}{t} " />ācārya's VI $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}$}}{s} " />ayataāvāda. [REVIEW]Sibajiban Bhattacharyya - 1986 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 14 (2).
Ga Boxclose_boxcloseboxclose\dot N $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} $}}{m} " /> $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} $}}{s} " /> $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} $}}{n} " />na of VYĀPTI (1). [REVIEW]Toshihiro Wada - 1995 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 23 (3).
On the symbolism of the mirror in indo-tibetan consecration rituals.Yael Bentor - 1995 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 23 (1):57-71.
Intention and suggestion in the Abhidharmakśa: sandhābhā\ underset {\ raise0. 3em\ hbox {ārevisited. [REVIEW]Michael M. Broido - 1985 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 13 (4):327-381.
The scope and necessity of angādhikāra.H. V. Nagaraja Rao - 1978 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 6 (2):145-176.
Annambha $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}$}}{t} " /> $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}$}}{t} " />a on Kara $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}$}}{n} " />a. [REVIEW]Dipankar Chatterjee - 1982 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 10 (2):155-160.
The scope and necessity of ang?dhik?ra.H. V. Nagaraja Rao - 1978 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 6 (2):145-176.
Introduction to dharmakīrti's theory of inference as presented in pramā $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}$}}{n} " />avārttika svopajñav $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}$}}{t} " />tti 1–10. [REVIEW]Richard P. Hayes & Brendan S. Gillon - 1991 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 19 (1).
An attempt to understand svata $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{h}$}}{h} " /> prāmā $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}$}}{n} " />yavāda in advaita vedānta. [REVIEW]Tara Chatterjee - 1991 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 19 (3).
A critique of an ontological approach to gaudapāda's māu $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$}}{n} \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{d}$}}{d} " />ūkya kārikās. [REVIEW]Stephen Kaplan - 1983 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 11 (4).
?ankara's views onyoga in theBrahmas?trabh? $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{S} $$ ya in the light of the authorship of theyogas?trabh? $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{S} $$ ya-vivara $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{N} $$ a. [REVIEW]T. S. Rukmani - 1993 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 21 (4):395-404.
Some remarks on the gu $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} $}}{n} " />agu $\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} $}}{n} " />ibhedabha _boxclose\dot nga chapter in udayana's ātmatattvaviveka. [REVIEW]Joy Laine - 1993 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 21 (3).
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-24
Downloads
9 (#937,893)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2014-01-24
Downloads
9 (#937,893)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Means of Formalisation in Indian and Western Logic.J. F. Staal - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (4):572-573.
