Interindividual variation in human color categories: Evidence against strong influence of language

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):510-510 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

With respect to human color categories, Steels & Belpaeme's (S&B's) simulations over-emphasize the possible influence of language. In humans, color processing is the result of a long evolutionary process in which categories developed without language. Common principles of color processing lead to similar color categories, but interindividual variation in color categories exists. Even color-deficiencies, causing large differences in color categories, remain inconspicuous in everyday life, thereby contradicting the hypothesis that language could play a role in color category formation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 78,003

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The disunity of color.Mohan Matthen - 1999 - Philosophical Review 108 (1):47-84.
Variations in color naming within and across populations.Michael A. Webster & Paul Kay - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):512-513.
Language and the game of life.Stevan Harnad - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):497-498.
Color, consciousness, and the isomorphism constraint.Stephen E. Palmer - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):923-943.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#332,259)

6 months
1 (#484,784)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references