A criticism of the “absolute space-time theory”

Foundations of Physics 8 (9-10):797-800 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that the so-called “absolute space-time theory” is inconsistent, in disagreement with some astronomical observations, and improperly titled

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Absolute time before Newton.Emmaline Bexley - 2009 - Dissertation, The University of Melbourne
Space and Time: The Ongoing Quest. [REVIEW]Eftichios Bitsakis - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (1):57-83.
Newton's views on space, time, and motion.Robert Rynasiewicz - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Leibniz on force and absolute motion.John T. Roberts - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):553-573.
Analysis of absolute space-time Lorentz theories.A. K. A. Maciel & J. Tiomno - 1989 - Foundations of Physics 19 (5):505-519.
A space-time theory with a privileged frame.T. Chang - 1983 - Foundations of Physics 13 (10):1013-1022.
On field's argument for substantivalism.Jerzy Gołosz - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):5 – 16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
42 (#370,986)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Nonrelativistic para-Lorentzian mechanics.J. G. Vargas - 1981 - Foundations of Physics 11 (3-4):235-278.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity.Edmund Whittaker - 1952 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (10):204-207.

Add more references