Russell and Schlick on Work and Play

The Bertrand Russell Society Bulletin 163:52-60 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concepts of work, labour, leisure, and play have been widely debated by the social sciences. By contrast, most canonical figures in the history of analytic philosophy have written very little, if anything, on the topic. One of the few exceptional discussions of the concept of labour and its history can be found in Bertrand Russell’s popular work from the 1930s, and more specifically his well-known essay ‘In Praise of Idleness’. In the essay, Russell attempts a spirited defence of a specific, qualified proposal for eventual reform: the universal limitation of the working day to four hours. Looming in the background of this proposal is a bolder thesis, namely the view that social progress involves the eventual minimisation (if not the complete elimination) of labour in the sphere of human activity. It is this bolder view that, as I shall show in what follows, Russell at least partly shares with another philosopher whose work shaped the history of analytic philosophy, Moritz Schlick. While Russell's work on the future of leisure and labour was written for a popular audience and widely read, Schlick’s early writings on work and play have not received adequate scholarly attention. Aside from some differences in their scope and details, there are some striking parallels between Russell’s and Schlick’s overall views on the future of work and play.

Similar books and articles

Russell's Defence of Idleness.Stephen Mumford - 2014 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 28 (1):5-19.
Russell's Defence of Idleness.Stephen Mumford - 2008 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 28 (1):5-19.
Russell's "Do Differences Differ?".Thomas R. Foster - 2009 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 29 (2).
Bertrand Russell on Idleness.Philippe Roussin, Johanna Liu & Yolaine Escande - 2010 - Philosophy and Culture 37 (9):61-73.
Bertrand Russell's Writings and Reflections on History.Kenneth R. Stunkel - 2001 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 21 (2).
Russell's "Horrible Travesty" of Meinong.Nicholas Griffin - 1977 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies:39-51.
Russell's "Horrible Travesty" of Meinong.Nicholas Griffin - 1977 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 25:39-51.
Moritz Schlick's Evolutionary Game Theory.Andreas Vrahimis - 2023 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 40 (4):317-337.
Intellect and Social Conscience: Essays on Bertrand Russell's Early Work.Margaret$Eeditor Moran - 1984 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 4 (1):1.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-31

Downloads
263 (#81,813)

6 months
120 (#43,404)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andreas Vrahimis
University of Cyprus

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Development of Logic.William Kneale & Martha Kneale - 1962 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. Edited by Martha Kneale.
Our Knowledge of the external World as a field of scientific method in Philosophy.Bertrand Russell - 1914 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 81:306-308.
The Vienna Circle’s reception of Nietzsche.Andreas Vrahimis - 2020 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 8 (9):1-29.

View all 15 references / Add more references