Conceptuality in spatial representations

Philosophical Psychology 20 (3):349 – 365 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The notion of conceptuality is still unclear and vague. I will present a definition of conceptual and nonconceptual representations that is grounded in different aspects of the representations’ structures. This definition is then used to interpret empirical results from human and animal navigation. It will be shown, that the distinction between egocentric and allocentric spatial representations can be matched onto the conceptual vs. nonconceptual distinction. The phenomena discussed in spatial navigation are thereby put into a wider context of cognitive abilities, which allows for new explanations of certain features of spatial representations and how they are linked to other capacities, like perception and reasoning



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

67 (#243,176)

6 months
4 (#792,963)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gottfried Vosgerau
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.
Mind and World.John Henry McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references