Representing with imaginary models: Formats matter

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (2):287-295 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Models such as the simple pendulum, isolated populations, and perfectly rational agents, play a central role in theorising. It is now widely acknowledged that a study of scientific representation should focus on the role of such imaginary entities in scientists’ reasoning. However, the question is most of the time cast as follows: How can fictional or abstract entities represent the phenomena? In this paper, I show that this question is not well posed. First, I clarify the notion of representation, and I emphasise the importance of what I call the “format” of a representation for the inferences agents can draw from it. Then, I show that the very same model can be presented under different formats, which do not enable scientists to perform the same inferences. Assuming that the main function of a representation is to allow one to draw predictions and explanations of the phenomena by reasoning with it, I conclude that imaginary models in abstracto are not used as representations: scientists always reason with formatted representations. Therefore, the problem of scientific representation does not lie in the relationship of imaginary entities with real systems. One should rather focus on the variety of the formats that are used in scientific practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,649

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emerging From Imaginary Time.Robert J. Deltete & Reed A. Guy - 1996 - Synthese 108 (2):185 - 203.
Imaginary Bodies and Worlds.Kathleen Lennon - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):107 – 122.
Representing with Physical Models.Ronald Giere - 2009 - In Paul Humphreys & Cyrille Imbert (eds.), Models, Simulations, and Representations. Routledge.
The Theoretician's Gambits: Scientific Representations, Their Formats and Content.Marion Vorms - 2010 - In Lorenzo Magnani, Walter Carnielli & Claudio Pizzi (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Springer. pp. 533--558.
Complete Topoi Representing Models of Set Theory.Andreas Blass & Andre Scedrov - 1992 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 57 (1):1-26.
Is Social Cognition Embodied?Alvin Goldman & Frederique de Vignemont - 2009 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (4):154-159.
The Role of Models in Boltzmann's.Nadine De Courtenay - 2002 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:103-119.
Model Cultural Si Secularizare.Marius Jucan - 2001 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 1 (1):106-122.
Modes, Media, and Formats of Scientific Representation.M. Vorms & T. Knuuttila - forthcoming - Erkenntnis: An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy.
The Analytic Imaginary.Marguerite La Caze - 1996 - Cornell University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-11

Downloads
62 (#190,328)

6 months
1 (#419,921)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marion Clara Vorms
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

References found in this work

The Strategy of Model-Based Science.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (5):725-740.
Models and Fiction.Roman Frigg - 2010 - Synthese 172 (2):251-268.
Scientific Representation: Against Similarity and Isomorphism.Mauricio Suárez - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (3):225-244.

View all 15 references / Add more references