Screening is not always healthy: an ethical analysis of health screening packages in Singapore

BMC Medical Ethics 23 (1):1-21 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

BackgroundHealth screening is undertaken to identify individuals who are deemed at higher risk of disease for further diagnostic testing so that they may possibly benefit from interventions to modify the natural course of disease. In Singapore, screening tests are widely available in the form of a package, which bundles multiple tests in one session and commonly includes non-recommended tests. There are various ethical issues associated with such testing as they may not be clinically appropriate and can result in more harm than benefit. This article describes the practice of health screening packages, identifies the ethical issues arising from such packages and discusses the implications of these ethical issues on policy and practice of screening in Singapore.MethodsA content analysis of the websites of providers offering general health screening packages to individuals was conducted. A total of 14 health screening package providers were analysed for how packages were conducted and promoted, how clinically appropriate screening tests were, and the price range and composition of screening packages. A normative ethical analysis based on the four principles approach of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice in biomedical ethics was used.ResultsTwelve of the 14 providers included non-recommended tests such as tumour markers, treadmill stress tests and MRI scans in their general health screening packages. Package prices ranged from S$26 to S$10,561, with providers charging higher when more tests were included. Health screening packages were broadly conducted in three stages: the offer and selection of a health screening package; medical assessment and performance of screening tests; a post-screening review. While material provided by all providers was factual, there was no information on the potential risks or harms of screening.ConclusionSeveral ethical issues were identified that should be addressed with regard to health screening packages in Singapore. A key issue was the information gap between providers and patients, which may result in patients undergoing inappropriate testing that may be more harmful than beneficial. Health screening packages can stimulate unnecessary demand for healthcare and contribute to an inequitable distribution of healthcare resources.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pre-employment genetic screening.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):420-420.
Ethical Concerns Regarding Advanced Screening Systems.Marc Andree Weber - 2014 - 9th Future Security 2014. Security Research ConferenceSeptember 16 – 18, 2014, Berlin; Proceedings.
The Ethics of Krabbe Newborn Screening.R. H. Dees & J. M. Kwon - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (1):114-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-08

Downloads
10 (#1,168,820)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yong Fang
Wuhan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations