Rene von Schomberg (ed.)
Publications Office of the European Union (2010)
AbstractThis book features the contribution of major European research projects on the governance and ethics of Nanotechnology. They focus on the responsible development of nanotechnology and on the understanding of public debate
Similar books and articles
Organising Collective Responsibility: On Precaution, Codes of Conduct and Understanding Public Debate. von Schomberg - 2010 - In U. Fiedeler (ed.), Understanding Nanotechnology. pp. 61-70.
Avoiding Empty Rhetoric: Engaging Publics in Debates About Nanotechnologies.Renee Kyle & Susan Dodds - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):81-96.
Why Do We Need to Know What the Public Thinks About Nanotechnology?Craig Cormick - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (2):167-173.
Deliberating Risks Under Uncertainty: Experience, Trust, and Attitudes in a Swiss Nanotechnology Stakeholder Discussion Group.Regula Valérie Burri - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (2):143-154.
Nanotechnology — a New Field of Ethical Inquiry?Armin Grunwald - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):187-201.
Trust as Glue in Nanotechnology Governance Networks.Heidrun Åm - 2011 - NanoEthics 5 (1):115-128.
Global Ethics and Nanotechnology: A Comparison of the Nanoethics Environments of the EU and China. [REVIEW]Sally Dalton-Brown - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (2):137-150.
Nanotechnology: A New Regime for the Public in Science?Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent - 2012 - Scientiae Studia 10 (SPE):85-94.
Regulation of hESC Research in Australia: Promises and Pitfalls for Deliberative Democratic Approaches.Susan Dodds & Rachel A. Ankeny - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):95-107.
On Identifying Plausibility and Deliberative Public Policy.René Schomberg - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):739-742.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Model for Responsible Governance.Neelke Doorn - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (1):29-43.
National Ethics Advisory Bodies in the Emerging Landscape of Responsible Research and Innovation.Franc Mali, Toni Pustovrh, Blanka Groboljsek & Christopher Coenen - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (3):167-184.
Engaging Whom and for What Ends? Australian Stakeholders' Constructions of Public Engagement in Relation to Nanotechnologies.Alan Petersen & Diana Bowman - 2012 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 12 (2):67-79.
Nanotechnology, Uncertainty and Regulation. A Guest Editorial.Simone Arnaldi & Alessia Muratorio - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (3):173-175.
Beyond Connectivity: The Internet of Food Architecture Between Ethics and the EU Citizenry.Luca Leone - 2017 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30 (3):423-438.
References found in this work
Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.David M. Rasmussen - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):571.
Delibration and Democratic Legitimacy.Joshua Cohen - 1989 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
Nano-Ethics as NEST-Ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology. [REVIEW]Tsjalling Swierstra & Arie Rip - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (1):3-20.
The Public and Its Problems. By Stephen C. Pepper. [REVIEW]John Dewey - 1927 - International Journal of Ethics 38:479.
The Mechanization of the Mind: On the Origins of Cognitive Science.Jean-Pierre Dupuy - 2000 - Princeton University Press.