On Identifying Plausibility and Deliberative Public Policy: Commentary on: “Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology”
Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):739-742 (2011)
Abstract
The identification of plausible epistemic approaches in science as well as the social problem definitions with which scientists implicitly work is essential for the quality of a deliberative public policy. While responding to the Nanofutures project, I will reflect on the essential elements of such a policy.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
On Identifying Plausibility and Deliberative Public Policy.René Schomberg - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):739-742.
Regulation of hESC research in australia: Promises and pitfalls for deliberative democratic approaches.Susan Dodds & Rachel A. Ankeny - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):95-107.
Revisiting “the voice of the people”: An evaluation of the claims and consequences of deliberative polling.Laurel S. Gleason - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (3):371-392.
Revisiting “the voice of the people”: An evaluation of the claims and consequences of deliberative polling.Laurel S. Gleason - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (3):371-392.
Avoiding empty rhetoric: Engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.Renee Kyle & Susan Dodds - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):81-96.
Environmental Policy With Integrity: A Lesson from the Discursive Dilemma.Kenneth Shockley - 2009 - Environmental Values 18 (2):177 - 199.
Public Deliberation and the Inclusion of Future Generations.Bernice Bovenkerk - 2015 - Jurisprudence 6 (3):496-515.
Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy.John Parkinson (ed.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Integration of deliberative democracy and policy-making: A vision of a deliberative system.Vanja Savic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (4):170-189.
Computer decision-support systems for public argumentation: assessing deliberative legitimacy. [REVIEW]William Rehg, Peter McBurney & Simon Parsons - 2005 - AI and Society 19 (3):203-228.
Deliberative Democracy and Emotional Intelligence: An Internal Mechanism to Regulate the Emotions. [REVIEW]Martyn Griffin - 2011 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (6):517-538.
Does public ignorance defeat deliberative democracy?Robert B. Talisse - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (4):455-463.
A Moral Voice in Public Policy: Responding to the Aids Pandemic.Maura Ann O'brien - 1989 - Dissertation, Georgetown University
Why Deliberative Democracy is (Still) Untenable.Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij - 2012 - Public Affairs Quarterly 26 (3):199-220.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-17
Downloads
14 (#733,501)
6 months
3 (#227,001)
2017-02-17
Downloads
14 (#733,501)
6 months
3 (#227,001)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Model for Responsible Governance.Neelke Doorn - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (1):29-43.
Editorial Overview: Public Science and Technology Scholars: Engaging Whom?Erik Fisher - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):607-620.
References found in this work
Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology.Cynthia Selin - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):723-737.
Questioning 'Participation': A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment.Michiel van Oudheusden - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):673-690.
