Philosophia Reformata 79 (1):54-65 (2014)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
This article criticises Alvin Plantinga’s claim that ‘basic’ design beliefs, which arise without a conscious inference, have more positive epistemic status than non-basic ones and that we cannot evaluate the probabilities involved in inferential, inductive design arguments.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1163/22116117-90000562 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 70,008
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- booksandjournals.brillonline.com
(no proxy) - brill.com (no proxy)
- brill.com [2] (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, & Naturalism.Alvin Plantinga - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
View all 11 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Glauben mit Gründen.Daniel Von Wachter - 2017 - In Georg Gasser, Ludwig Jaskolla & Thomas Schärtl (eds.), Handbuch zur Analytischen Theologie. pp. 131-157.
Similar books and articles
Epistemology As Theology: An Evaluation of Alvin Plantinga's Religious Epistemology.James K. Beilby - 2005 - Ashgate.
Plantinga’s Probability Arguments Against Evolutionary Naturalism.Branden Fitelson & Elliott Sober - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):115–129.
REVIEW of Beilby, James, Ed., Naturalism Defeated? For Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2002). [REVIEW]John Post - unknown
Plantinga-Warrant and Reliabilist Warrant.Jerome Gellman - 2014 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 18 (2):291.
Alvin Plantinga and the Argument From Evil.Michael Tooley - 1980 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (4):360 – 376.
What Kind of Classical Foundationalism has Plantinga Refuted?Ralf-Thomas Klein - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):304-311.
What Kind of Classical Foundationalism has Plantinga Refuted?R.-T. Klein - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (3).
The Application-Conditions for Design Inferences: Why the Design Arguments Need the Help of Other Arguments for God’s Existence.Kenneth Einar Himma - 2005 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (1):1-33.
Teleological and Design Arguments.Laura L. Garcia - 2010 - In A Companion to Philosophy of Religion (Second Edition). Wiley-Blackwell.
Arguments From Design: A Self-Defeating Strategy?Victoria Harrison - 2005 - Philosophia 33 (1-4):297-317.
Knowledge of God * by Alvin Plantinga and Michael Tooley.T. J. Mawson - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):591-592.
Methodological Naturalism Under Attack.Michael Ruse - 2005 - South African Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):44-60.
The Ontological Argument.Graham Oppy - 2008 - In Paul Copan & Chad V. Meister (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Issues. Oxford UK: Blackwell.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2016-06-30
Total views
39 ( #290,758 of 2,505,154 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,154 )
2016-06-30
Total views
39 ( #290,758 of 2,505,154 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,154 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
