Keep score and punish: Brandom’s concept of responsibility

Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (8):922-941 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although seldom examined and not explained by Robert Brandom himself, the concept of responsibility is as important as the concept of inference for Brandom’s account of discursivity. Whereas ‘inference’ makes explicit the propositional content of concepts as the inferentially structured totality of their relations of material incompatibility, ‘responsibility’ makes explicit the normative force of these relations. ‘Responsibility’ thus becomes the paradigm of understanding normativity’s binding force – and my critical reading demonstrates that it fosters a moralizing, juridifying and economizing understanding of normativity’s binding force. Furthermore, a diagnostic interpretation of Nietzsche’s genealogy of ‘responsibility’ reveals that Brandom’s concept of ‘responsibility’ is not an exception but exemplary for how ‘responsibility’ is used in philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,400

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genuine Normativity, Expressive Bootstrapping, and Normative Phenomenalism.David Lauer - 2009 - Etica and Politica / Ethics & Politics 11 (1):321-350.
Making it Implicit: Brandom on Rule Following.Anandi Hattiangadi - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):419-431.
When Alston met Brandom: Defining assertion.Matthew J. Cull - 2019 - Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 13 (1):36-50.
Arendt and Nietzsche on responsibility and futurity.Rosalyn Diprose - 2008 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (6):617-642.
Brandom on modality, normativity, and intentionality.Gideon Rosen - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):611-23.
Brandom on the normativity of meaning.Lionel Shapiro - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):141-60.
Drei Gefahren philosophischer Begriffsanalysen von Verantwortung.Frieder Vogelmann - 2016 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 64 (2):273-286.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-01

Downloads
15 (#700,732)

6 months
3 (#227,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frieder Vogelmann
University of Freiburg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations