Review of Stanovich, K., West, R. and Toplak, M. ‘The rationality quotient: Toward a test of rational thinking’, Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press [Book Review]

Quarterly Review of Biology 93:43-44 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The rationality quotient: toward a test of rational thinking, by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, and Maggie E. Toplak. [REVIEW]Joshua Weller - 2017 - Thinking and Reasoning 23 (4):497-502.
Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test.Maggie E. Toplak, Richard F. West & Keith E. Stanovich - 2014 - Thinking and Reasoning 20 (2):147-168.
Book Review: The Rationality Quotient—Toward a Test of Rational Thinking. [REVIEW]Mátyás Makay - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
The need for intellectual diversity in psychological science: Our own studies of actively open-minded thinking as a case study.Keith E. Stanovich & Maggie E. Toplak - 2019 - Cognition 187 (C):156-166.
Rational distinctions and adaptations.D. E. Over & J. St B. T. Evans - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):693-694.
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Implicit learning of (boundedly) rational behaviour.K. E. Stanovich, R. F. West & D. J. Zizzo - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):700-700.
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-A psychological point of view: Violations of rational rules as a diagnostic of mental processes.K. E. Stanovich, R. F. West & D. Kalmeman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):681-682.
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Dilemmas of rationality.K. E. Stanovich, R. F. West & K. I. Manktelow - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):687-687.
Evolutionary versus instrumental goals: How evolutionary psychology misconceives human rationality.Keith E. Stanovich & R. F. West - 2003 - In David E. Over (ed.), Evolution and the Psychology of Thinking: The Debate. Psychology Press. pp. 171--230.
Higher-order preferences and the master rationality motive.Keith E. Stanovich - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (1):111 – 127.
On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: Implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning.Keith E. Stanovich - 2012 - The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning.
The Tao of thinking.Deborah Frisch - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):672-673.
Stanovich's arguments against the “adaptive rationality” project: An assessment.Andrea Polonioli - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 49:55-62.
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-The rationality debate from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory.K. E. Stanovich, R. F. West & S. Epstein - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):671.
Advancing the rationality debate.Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):701-717.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-19

Downloads
250 (#77,261)

6 months
50 (#80,425)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Vlerick
Tilburg University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references