Foundations of Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Social Systems
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (4):481-516 (1999)
Abstract
Of all contemporary social theorists, Luhmann has best understood the centrality of the concept of meaning to social theory and has most extensively worked out the notion's implications. However, despite the power of his theory, the theory suffers from difficulties impeding its reception. This article attempts to remedy this situation with some critical arguments and proposals for revision. First, the theory Luhmann adopted from biology as the basis of his own theory was a poor choice since that theory has no explanatory power, being purely descriptive; furthermore, that theory is fundamentally flawed since it implies that viruses are impossible. Second, Luhmann's theory of meaning cannot coherently make the social domain autonomous as he desires since Luhmann does not take into account the distinction between syntax and semantics. By introducing this distinction, making clear that social systems consist of rules, not just communications, and raising the rule concept to the same prominence in social theory as those of actor and system, autonomy can be maintained while avoiding the counterintuitive aspects of Luhmann's theory.DOI
10.1177/004839319902900402
My notes
Similar books and articles
Beyond Historicism: From Leibniz to Luhmann.Jaap den Hollander - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2):210-225.
Luhmann and emergentism: Competing paradigms for social systems theory?Dave Elder-Vass - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (4):408-432.
Objectivity, value spheres, and "inherent laws": On some suggestive isomorphisms between Weber, Bourdieu, and Luhmann.Hans Henrik Bruun - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (1):97-120.
Systems in Context: On the Outcome of the Habermas/Luhmann debate.Poul F. Kjaer - 2006 - Ancilla Iuris 1:66-77.
Niklas Luhmann's systems theoretical redescription of the inclusion/exclusion debate.Antoon Braeckman - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (1):65-88.
Emergence a la Systems Theory: Epistemological Totalausschluss or Ontological Novelty?P. Y.-Z. Wan - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (2):178-210.
Niklas Luhmann's systems theory as a challenge for ethics.Hans-Ulrich Dallmann - 1998 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1):85-102.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
99 (#126,496)
6 months
3 (#224,651)
2009-01-28
Downloads
99 (#126,496)
6 months
3 (#224,651)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Luhmann and emergentism: Competing paradigms for social systems theory?Dave Elder-Vass - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (4):408-432.
Philosophy of the Internet. A Discourse on the Nature of the Internet.Laszlo Ropolyi - 2013 - Budapest: Eötvös University.
Space is the Place: The Laws of Form and Social Systems.Michael Schiltz - 2007 - Thesis Eleven 88 (1):8-30.
Order at the Edge of Chaos: Meanings from Netdom Switchings Across Functional Systems.Jorge Fontdevila, M. Pilar Opazo & Harrison C. White - 2011 - Sociological Theory 29 (3):178-198.