Dynamic relation logic is the logic of DPL-Relations

Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6 (4):441-452 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we prove that the principles in the languagewith relation composition and dynamic implication, valid forall binary relations, are the same ones as the principlesvalid when we restrict ourselves to DPL-relations,i.e. relations generated from conditions (tests) and resettings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#380,496)

6 months
6 (#588,321)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Incremental dynamics.Jan van Eijck - 2001 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (3):319-351.
Variables as stacks.C. F. M. Vermeulen - 2000 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (2):143-167.
Relational validity & dynamic predicate logic.Albert Visser - 1997 - Journal of Logic Language and Information 6:441-452.
Dynamic negation, the one and only.Marco Hollenberg & Albert Visser - 1999 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (2):137-141.
The donkey and the monoid. Dynamic semantics with control elements.Albert Visser - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (1):107-131.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dynamic predicate logic.Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof - 1991 - Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (1):39-100.
A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation.Hans Kamp - 1981 - In P. Portner & B. H. Partee (eds.), Formal Semantics - the Essential Readings. Blackwell. pp. 189--222.
An equational axiomatization of dynamic negation and relational composition.Marco Hollenberg - 1997 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6 (4):381-401.
Dynamic squares.Patrick Blackburn & Yde Venema - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (5):469 - 523.

Add more references