Philo's Final Conclusion in Hume's Dialogues1: A. G. VINK

Religious Studies 25 (4):489-499 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

‘Truly this is the sweetest of theologies’, William said, with perfect humility, and I thought he was using that insidious figure of thought that rhetors call irony, which must always be prefaced by the pronunciatio, representing its signal and its justification – something William never did. For which reason the abbot, more inclined to the use of figures of speech, took William literally…

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gesprekken over de natuurlijke godsdienst.D. Hume & A. Vink - 1994 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 56 (1):148-149.
On Aristotelian Universals and Individuals.Irena Cronin - 2015 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):341-348.
Natural belief and religious belief in Hume's philosophy.Terence Penelhum - 1983 - Philosophical Quarterly 33 (131):166-181.
Doxastic Naturalism and Hume's Voice in the Dialogues.C. M. Lorkowski - 2016 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 14 (3):253-274.
Part X of Hume's "Dialogues".William H. Capitan - 1966 - American Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1):82-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
32 (#431,738)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Hume’s philosophy of religion.John Charles Addison Gaskin - 1978 - Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
Hume's Philosophy of Religion.Louis E. Loeb - 1981 - Philosophical Review 90 (2):283.
Hume's critique of religion.J. C. A. Gaskin - 1976 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (3):301-311.

View all 10 references / Add more references