Abstract

One of the main problems attributed to the higher-order theories of consciousness(HOT) lies in its consideration of non-human animals, as well as infants, as non-conscious beings. In response, some HOT theorists, such as Rocco Gennaro, argue that this claimis based on a false assumption, while others, such as Peter Carruthers, deny that the non-attribution of consciousness to animals is a problem. The present work will describe thecriticism mentioned to the HOTs, as well as the two possible replies presented by Gennaroand Carruthers. Taking sides for Gennaro’s proposal will be carried out a critical review of the second.