Living Systems: Autonomy, Autopoiesis and Enaction

Philosophy and Technology 28 (2):225-239 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The autopoietic theory and the enactive approach are two theoretical streams that, in spite of their historical link and conceptual affinities, offer very different views on the nature of living beings. In this paper, we compare these views and evaluate, in an exploratory way, their respective degrees of internal coherence. Focusing the analyses on certain key notions such as autonomy and organizational closure, we argue that while the autopoietic theory manages to elaborate an internally consistent conception of living beings, the enactive approach presents an internal tension regarding its characterization of living beings as intentional systems directed at the environment

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,442

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autopoiesis and Autonomy in the Space of Meaning.A. Karafillidis - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):175-177.
Social Autopoiesis?H. Urrestarazu - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):153-166.
How Can a Social System Be Autopoietic?Raivo Palmaru - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):170-172.
Social Systems: Unearthing the Big Picture.S. J. Cowley & V. Raimondi - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):179-181.
Extended life.Ezequiel A. Di Paolo - 2008 - Topoi 28 (1):9-21.
Nonlinear cobweb of cognition.Helena Knyazeva - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (3):167-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-16

Downloads
66 (#183,472)

6 months
2 (#301,800)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?