Against Context-Sensitivity Tests

Grazer Philosophische Studien 88 (1):189-209 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The aim of this paper is to show that tests for semantic context-sensitivity are of no help in the debate between semantic contextualists and minimalists. Two kinds of context-sensitivity tests are discussed: Cappelen & Lepore's says-that tests and Cappelen & Hawthorne's agreement-based tests. It is shown that Cappelen & Lepore's tests are unreliable because they are based on unstable data. Then it is argued that although the data of Cappelen & Hawthorne's tests is more reliable, contextualists and minimalists alike can explain this data. The paper ends by pointing to ways in which the debate might be moved forward without context-sensitivity tests



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

44 (#363,552)

6 months
10 (#276,689)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Emanuel Viebahn
Freie Universit├Ąt Berlin

Citations of this work

Ways of Using Words: On Semantic Intentions.Emanuel Viebahn - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (1):93-117.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references