The Epicurean Notion of Death: Modern Day Support of an Ancient Idea

Abstract

The premise that ‘death is annihilation’ in Epicurus’ argument that death is of no harm to us was justified using his atomistic conception of the soul. In modern times, this conception of the soul isn’t feasible, making his premise unacceptable and his argument unsound. This paper will use the modern notion of the Mind-Brain Dependence Theory to provide justification for his claim that death is the annihilation of the self in order preserve the soundness of his argument.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Lucretius and the Fears of Death.Peter Aronoff - 1997 - Dissertation, Cornell University
Rationality and the Fear of Death in Epicurean Philosophy.Voula Tsouna - 2006 - Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 1:79-117.
Epicurean equanimity towards death.Kai Draper - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1):92–114.
The Epicurean View of Death.Eric T. Olson - 2013 - The Journal of Ethics 17 (1-2):65-78.
Can death be a harm to the person who dies?W. Glannon - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):e3-e3.
The Time of Death's Badness.J. Johansson - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (5):464-479.
Epicurus, Death, and the Wrongness of Killing.Mikel Burley - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):68-86.
Death.Shelly Kagan - 2012 - New Haven: Yale University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-05

Downloads
15 (#923,100)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christian Vido
University of Windsor

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references