Distinguishing general theory, doctrine and evidence in criminal responsibility: a response to Lacey

Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (3):259-265 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
59 (#261,735)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Victor Tadros
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

Response to Norrie and Tadros.Nicola Lacey - 2007 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (3):267-269.

Add more citations

References found in this work

If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich?G. A. Cohen - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (205):563-565.
Criminal Responsibility.Victor Tadros - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Iv-answering for crime.R. A. Duff - 2006 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1):87-113.
The Mark of Responsibility.John Gardner - 2003 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2):157-171.

View all 12 references / Add more references