Measuring Complexity: Things That Go Wrong and How to Get It Right—Version 2

Abstract

Seven problems that occur in attempts to measure complexity are pointed out as they occur in four proposed measurement techniques. Each example method is an improvement over the previous examples. It turns out, however, that none are up to the challenge of complexity. Apparently, there is no currently available method that truly gets the measure of complexity. There are two reasons. First, the most natural approach, quantitative analysis, is rendered inadequate by the very nature of complexity. Second, the intrinsic magnitude of complexity is still holding at bay attempts to use both quantitative and qualitative methods combined. Further progress in complexity science and in systems science is required. Any method that simplifies will fail because it ignores what complexity is. Techniques of understanding that do not simplify, but rather provide ways for the mind to grasp and work with complexity are more effective in getting its measure.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Measuring complexity using information fluctuation.Harvey K. Shepard - 1995 - In R. J. Russell, N. Murphy & A. R. Peacocke (eds.), Chaos and Complexity. Vatican Observatory Publications. pp. 303.
Naturalism: So Easily Wrong.Robert Cummings Neville - 2013 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 34 (3):199-213.
Complexity: From formal analysis to final action.Douglas Frye & Philip David Zelazo - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):836-837.
Benefiting from the Wrongdoing of Others.Robert E. Goodin & Christian Barry - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (2):363-376.
Can There Be Full Excuses for Morally Wrong Actions?Eduardo Rivera-lópez - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):124-142.
Deissler Rank Complexity of Powers of Indecomposable Injective Modules.R. Chartrand & T. Kucera - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (3):398-402.
Grasping the Third Realm.John Bengson - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 5.
Cogs, Dogs, and Robot Frogs.Michael Hector Storck - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:253-264.
‘If things were simple...’: complexity in education.Brent Davis & Dennis Sumara - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (4):856-860.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-26

Downloads
579 (#29,153)

6 months
43 (#88,114)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references