Whitehead and the Immanence of Extension

Process Studies 50 (2):201-221 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Extensive Continuum is most often seen as an empty form that awaits the accommodation of actuality. Contrary to this popular interpretation, I argue that extension is completely immanent to actual occasions and their prehensive relations. Whitehead's doctrine of internal relations entails that extension cannot be separated from actual occasions, just as actual occasions cannot be separated from extension. To prehend is to extend. Furthermore, any strict separation of form and actuality is shown to bifurcate nature into publicity and privacy. Only with the immanence of extension is nature truly one.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marcuse and Eternal Objects.Duston Moore - 2008 - Process Studies 37 (2):45-67.
An Interpretation of Whitehead's Metaphysics. [REVIEW]S. F. L. - 1959 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (4):662-663.
Whitehead's extensive continuum.David L. Miller - 1946 - Philosophy of Science 13 (2):144-149.
Whitehead on God and the World.Uen-fu Kuo - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 61:109-114.
La philosophie comme panphysique. [REVIEW]S. F. L. - 1982 - Review of Metaphysics 35 (3):607-609.
La philosophie comme panphysique. [REVIEW]L. S. F. - 1982 - Review of Metaphysics 35 (3):607-609.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-24

Downloads
16 (#847,064)

6 months
6 (#403,662)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations