On Disproportionate Force and Fighting in Vain

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):235-261 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two conditions guiding permissible use of force in self-defence are proportionality and success. According to the proportionality condition the means used to prevent an attack can be permissible only if they are proportional to the interest at stake. According to the success condition, otherwise impermissible acts can be justified under the right to self-defence only if they are likely to succeed in preventing the perceived threat. These requirements should not always be interpreted narrowly. Sometimes people are permitted to kill culpable aggressors in order to avoid a non-lethal harm. Sometimes people are permitted to take up arms to defend themselves against culpable aggressors they have little or no hope of defeating.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On disproportionate force and fighting in vain.Gerhard Øverland - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):235-261.
Proportionality in the Conduct of War.Paul Gilbert - 2005 - Journal of Military Ethics 4 (2):100-107.
Taking the name of science in vain.Horace James Bridges - 1928 - Freeport, N.Y.,: Books for Libraries Press.
The force of reason and the logic of force.Richard A. Lee - 2004 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Play fighting versus serious fighting in golden hamsters.Damian I. Onyekwere & J. Martín Ramírez - 1993 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (6):503-506.
Explaining the principle of Mala in se.Morten Dige - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (4):318-332.
Defensive Killing.Helen Frowe - 2014 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Against Moral Taint.Yitzhak Benbaji & Daniel Statman - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (1):5-18.
What Is Self-Defense?Uwe Steinhoff - 2015 - Public Affairs Quarterly 29 (4):385-402.
Feminism, Honor and Self-Defense: A Response to Hereth.Daniel Statman - 2023 - Public Affairs Quarterly 37 (1):64-78.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Self-defense.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1991 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (4):283-310.
The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
Killing the Innocent in Self‐Defense.Michael Otsuka - 1994 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (1):74-94.
The basis of moral liability to defensive killing.Jeff McMahan - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):386–405.

View all 15 references / Add more references