On disproportionate force and fighting in vain

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):235-261 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two conditions guiding permissible use of force in self-defence are proportionality and success. According to the proportionality condition the means used to prevent an attack can be permissible only if they are proportional to the interest at stake.1 According to the success condition, otherwise impermissible acts can be justified under the right to self-defence only if they are likely to succeed in preventing the perceived threat.2 These requirements should not always be interpreted narrowly. Sometimes people are permitted to kill culpable aggressors in order to avoid a non-lethal harm. Sometimes people are permitted to take up arms to defend themselves against culpable aggressors they have little or no hope of ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-defense, innocent aggressors, and the duty of martyrdom.Whitley Kaufman - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (1):78-96.
Proportionality in the Conduct of War.Paul Gilbert - 2005 - Journal of Military Ethics 4 (2):100-107.
A practical account of self-defence.Helen Frowe - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (3):245-272.
Explaining the principle of Mala in se.Morten Dige - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (4):318-332.
Conditional Threats.Gerhard Øverland - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (3):334-345.
Proportionality and Self-Defense.Suzanne Uniacke - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (3):253-272.
Dividing Harm.Gerhard Øverland - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (4):547-566.
Contagious disease and self-defence.T. M. Wilkinson - 2007 - Res Publica 13 (4):339-359.
Minarchism.Jan Narveson - 2003 - Etica E Politica 5 (2):1-14.
Provocateurs.Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (3):597-622.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-18

Downloads
62 (#254,324)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Killing and Rescuing: Why Necessity Must Be Rethought.Kieran Oberman - 2020 - Philosophical Review 129 (3):433-463.
Against Moral Taint.Yitzhak Benbaji & Daniel Statman - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (1):5-18.
What Is Self-Defense?Uwe Steinhoff - 2015 - Public Affairs Quarterly 29 (4):385-402.
Feminism, Honor and Self-Defense: A Response to Hereth.Daniel Statman - 2023 - Public Affairs Quarterly 37 (1):64-78.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Self-defense.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1991 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (4):283-310.
The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
Killing the Innocent in Self‐Defense.Michael Otsuka - 1994 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (1):74-94.
The basis of moral liability to defensive killing.Jeff McMahan - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):386–405.

View all 17 references / Add more references