Laughter as a Semiotic Problem

Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 20:5-15 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose. The article is aimed to substantiate the view on the phenomenon of laughter as a subject of semiotic analysis, which leads to the following tasks: to reveal the possibilities of semiotics application in the study of laughter nature; to analyze the phenomenon of laughter as a cultural and natural phenomenon, as a sign and as an attribute; to consider the place of laughter in culture, which is understood as a sign system. Theoretical basis. The semiotic approach proceeds from the fact that human lives in the world of signs, all the surrounding reality can be interpreted as a sign system. The basic concept of semiotics is the concept of a sign. The theoretical basis of the article is understanding the culture as a sign-symbolic system. Laughter is considered as a phenomenon ontologically rooted in human culture. At the same time, laughter is on the edge of culture. The research is based on the work of semiotic authors, cultural researchers, and the researchers of laughter. Originality. The originality lies in the application of the semiotic method to the research of laughter phenomenon, consideration of the dialectics of natural and cultural, signedness and non-signedness, manifested in the phenomenon of laughter. Conclusions. Laughter is considered as a psychophysiological phenomenon and as a cultural phenomenon. Laughter acts as an emotional manifestation, a physiological reaction, but socially and culturally mediated. In any case, laughter indicates an emotional or cognitive state of a human. Laughter acts as a process and result of the interpretation of a sign, a reaction to a sign. Laughter is a form and a means of communication. Being a natural phenomenon, in the process of social evolution, laughter acquires signedness, is integrated by culture as a sign system, and, at the same time, maintains a connection with nature. Thus, laughter occupies an ambivalent position between nature and culture. In the phenomenon of laughter, the dual state of human is revealed. In laughter, boundaries are blurred, the unity and opposition of natural and cultural, biological and social, soul and body, thought and feeling, sign and attribute are manifested.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Daring to laugh.Л Облова - 2011 - Докса 16:82-93.
Projections.Irene Machado - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (2):463-476.
Projections.Irene Machado - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (2):463-476.
Laughter and the world: sides of philosophical dialogue.O. Rodniy - 2011 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (21):3-7.
Exposing the Rogue in Us.Annie Hounsokou - 2012 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):317-336.
After the Laughter.Barbara S. Stengel - 2014 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 46 (2):200-211.
Hobbes on laughter.R. E. Ewin - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (202):29-40.
Laughter and pleasure.Karl Pfeifer - 1994 - Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 7 (2):157-172.
Nietzsche’s Joy.Jason M. Wirth - 2005 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (1):117-139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-31

Downloads
2 (#1,755,150)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Laughter.Roger Scruton & Peter Jones - 1982 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 56 (1):197 - 228.
Laughter.Roger Scruton & Peter Jones - 1982 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 56 (1):197-228.
Проблема целостности.И. А Герасимова - 2010 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 23 (1):64-66.

View all 7 references / Add more references