How the Law Affects Gun Policy in the United States: Law as Intervention or Obstacle to Prevention

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (4):692-704 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In our experience, public health practitioners seeking to address a health problem often have just two very basic questions about the law: how can I use the law to create new interventions, or improve existing ones, to protect the public’s health; and will the law prevent me from successfully implementing certain interventions? In this way, the law is seen as either an opportunity for intervention to affect a public health problem, or an obstacle to enacting or implementing a desired intervention.In addition, because some public health practitioners may not fully understand the intricacies of a given legal area, some possible obstacles to intervention may be either real or perceived. A real legal obstacle is not necessarily an insurmountable one, but it does have genuine legal force. A perceived obstacle has little, if any, true legal application to a given kind of intervention.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The United States Supreme Court and Health Law: The Year in Review.Theodore W. Ruger - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (3):611-615.
Action and value in criminal law.Stephen Shute, John Gardner & Jeremy Horder (eds.) - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Role of Federal Preemption in Injury Prevention Litigation.Jon S. Vernick - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (s1):85-88.
Criminal law theory: doctrines of the general part.Stephen Shute & Andrew Simester (eds.) - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
14 (#961,492)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?