- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Genetic Modification of Animals
The Monist 79 (2):247-263 (1996)
Abstract
In this article I will explore the problem of 'forbidden knowledge' on the basis of my own experience in the Netherlands with the development of a regulative framework for all research involving the production and use of genetically modified animals. Although it is not yet definitely settled, this regulative framework is based on what is called the 'no, unless'-principle. The 'no, unless' policy has been defined by Brom and Schroten in the following wayISBN(s)
0026-9662
DOI
10.5840/monist199679212
My notes
Similar books and articles
Genetic modification and genetic determinism.David B. Resnik & Daniel B. Vorhaus - 2006 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 1:9.
The concept of intrinsic value and transgenic animals.H. Verhoog - 1992 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (2):147-160.
The ethics of inheritable genetic modification: a dividing line?John E. J. Rasko, Gabrielle O'Sullivan & Rachel A. Ankeny (eds.) - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
‘Ethical concepts regarding the genetic engineering of laboratory animals’: A confrontation with moral beliefs from the practice of biomedical research.R. de Vries - 2006 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9 (2):211-225.
Similarity Arguments in the Genetic Modification Debate.Andreas Christiansen - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (2):239-255.
Re-negotiating Science in Environmentalists' Submissions to New Zealand's Royal Commission on Genetic Modification.Tee Rogers-Hayden & John R. Campbell - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (4):515 - 534.
Genetic engineering and the integrity of animals.Rob De Vries - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (5):469-493.
Modification of farm animals by genetic engineering and immunomodulation.I. Wilmut - 1995 - In T. B. Mepham, G. A. Tucker & J. Wiseman (eds.), Issues in Agricultural Bioethics. Nottingham University Press. pp. 229--246.
Some Jewish thoughts on genetic enhancement.S. M. Glick - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):415-419.
Dis/integrating animals: ethical dimensions of the genetic engineering of animals for human consumption. [REVIEW]Traci Warkentin - 2006 - AI and Society 20 (1):82-102.
Genetic modification and genetic determinism.Resnik David & Vorhaus Daniel - 2006 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 1.
A Kantian argument against comparatively advantageous genetic modification.D. Jensen - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (8):479-482.
Animals in their nature: a case study of public attitudes on animals, genetic modification and 'nature'.Phil Macnaghten - unknown
Ethical Issues and Potential Stakeholder Priorities Associated with the Application of Genomic Technologies Applied to Animal Production Systems.David Coles, Lynn J. Frewer & Ellen Goddard - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (2):231-253.
Risks associated with genetic modification: – An annotated bibliography of Peer reviewed natural science publications. [REVIEW]Sean A. Weaver & Michael C. Morris - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (2):157-189.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-09
Downloads
60 (#208,905)
6 months
1 (#478,361)
2011-01-09
Downloads
60 (#208,905)
6 months
1 (#478,361)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Does organic farming face distinctive livestock welfare issues? – A conceptual analysis.Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe, Mette Vaarst & Erik Steen Kristensen - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):275-299.
The food debate: Ethical versus substantial equivalence. [REVIEW]Sylvie Pouteau - 2002 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (3):289-303.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b5888c749-qlr2k N