Darwin's Philosophical Legacy: The Good and the Not-so-Good

Lexington Books (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is hardly any university, college, or even high school left where they do not teach Darwinism—and rightly so. Yet, most of these places do more preaching than teaching. They teach more than they should, and at the same time, they teach less than they should. This book wants to evaluate Darwin’s legacy from a philosophical viewpoint by trying to analyze the strong points as well as the weak points of what came to be known as neo-Darwinism

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,951

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Darwinism and Neo‐Darwinism.James G. Lennox - 2008 - In Sahorta Sarkar & Anya Plutynski, Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Blackwell. pp. 77–98.
Philosophy for Children and Other People.William J. Rapaport - 1987 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Teaching Philosophy (Summer):19-22.
Docilitas: on teaching and being taught.James V. Schall - 2016 - South Bend, Indiana: St. Augustine's Press.
The Role of Arguments in Philosophy.Dagfinn Føllesdal - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Research 40 (Supplement):17-23.
Social Darwinism: from reality to myth and from myth to reality.Daniel Becquemont - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):12-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-06

Downloads
12 (#1,472,124)

6 months
1 (#1,602,128)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references