- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A Dutch report on the ethics of neonatal care
Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1):14-18 (1995)
Abstract
The Dutch Paediatric Association reports consensus among its members regarding the necessity to take the future quality of life into account when reaching decisions regarding the continuation or dis-continuation of life-prolonging treatment. The paramount importance of the discussion with the parents is stressed. Dissension exists regarding active euthanasia in the newborn, both opinions being respected. If dissension exists within the profession parents should be informed and if necessary referred to a doctor who shares their moral viewsAuthor's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Dutch report on the ethics of neonatal care: a commentary.R. Rivers - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1):17-18.
Response to “Neonatal Viability in the 1990s: Held Hostage by Technology” by Jonathan Muraskas et al. and “Giving 'Moral Distress' a Voice: Ethical Concerns among Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Personnel” by Pam Hefferman and Steve Heilig. [REVIEW]Thomas J. Simpson - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):524-526.
Response to “Giving 'Moral Distress' a Voice: Ethical Concerns Among Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Personnel” by Pam Hefferman and Steve Heilig and “Neonatal Viability in the 1990s: Held Hostage by Technology” by Jonathan Muraskas et al. [REVIEW]Anita J. Catlin & Brian S. Carter - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):400-403.
Semi-qualitative study of staff attitudes to care following decision to withdraw active treatment in a neonatal intensive care unit.M. Davie & A. Kaiser - 2007 - Clinical Ethics 2 (3):133-138.
Medicalization and obstetric care: An analysis of developments in Dutch midwifery.Anke D. J. Smeenk & Henk A. M. J. ten Have - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (2):153-165.
Multicultural Health Care in Practice.Gert Olthuis & Godelieve Heterevann - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (3):199-206.
Neonatal euthanasia: Why require parental consent? [REVIEW]Jacob M. Appel - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (4):477-482.
End of life decision-making in neonatal care.C. April & M. Parker - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (3):126-127.
The Role of an Ethics Committee in Resolving Conflict in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Robert M. Nelson & Robyn S. Shapiro - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (1):27-32.
Health care ethics and health law in the dutch discussion on end-of-life decisions: A historical analysis of the dynamics and development of both disciplines.L. Kater, R. Houtepen, R. Vries & G. Widdershoven - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (4):669-684.
Parents' participation in the care of their child in neonatal intensive care.Marie Berg & Helena Wigert - 2011 - In Gill Thomson, Fiona Dykes & Soo Downe (eds.), Qualitative Research in Midwifery and Childbirth Phenomenological Approaches. Routledge.
The challenge of integrating justice and care in neonatal nursing.E. O. C. Hall, B. S. Brinchmann & H. Aagaard - 2012 - Nursing Ethics 19 (1):80-90.
Too Expensive to Treat? Finitude, Tragedy, and the Neonatal ICU: Charles C. Camosy, 2010, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.Ola Didrik Saugstad - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (2):253-255.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-13
Downloads
65 (#245,019)
6 months
3 (#1,002,413)
2010-09-13
Downloads
65 (#245,019)
6 months
3 (#1,002,413)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Withholding/withdrawing treatment from neonates: legislation and official guidelines across Europe.H. E. McHaffie, M. Cuttini, G. Brolz-Voit, L. Randag, R. Mousty, A. M. Duguet, B. Wennergren & P. Benciolini - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (6):440-446.
Elternzentrierte ethische Entscheidungsfindung für Frühgeborene im Grenzbereich der Lebensfähigkeit – Reflexion über die Bedeutung probabilistischer Prognosen als Entscheidungsgrundlage.André Kidszun - 2021 - Ethik in der Medizin 34 (1):81-98.
A Dutch report on the ethics of neonatal care: a commentary.R. Rivers - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1):17-18.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo