Hobbes' two accounts of law and the structure of reasons for political obedience

European Journal of Political Theory 13 (3):282-298 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thomas Hobbes’s political theory contains conceptual theses on law, including an analysis of the way legal requirements affect practical reasoning. However, Hobbes’ account of law and the structure of reasons for political obedience is extremely ambiguous. In this paper, I show that Hobbes develops not one but two different accounts. Also, I argue that the two theories are in tension, something that Hobbes himself seems to recognize to some extent

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hobbes and the law.David Dyzenhaus & Thomas Poole (eds.) - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Hobbes and the natural law tradition.Norberto Bobbio - 1993 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hobbes on miracles.By John Whipple - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (1):117–142.
On Thomas Hobbes's Fallible Natural Law Theory.Michael Cuffaro - 2011 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (2):175-190.
On the citizen.Thomas Hobbes - 1998 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Richard Tuck & Michael Silverthorne.
Hobbes and Psychological Egoism.Bernard Gert - 1967 - Journal of the History of Ideas 28 (4):503-520.
The political jurisprudence of Thomas Hobbes.Martin Loughlin - 2012 - In David Dyzenhaus & Thomas Poole (eds.), Hobbes and the law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes: Moral and Political Philosophy.Garrath Williams - 2003 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-14

Downloads
191 (#100,442)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references