Hastings Center Report 50 (6):39-40 (2020)

Authors
Sridhar Venkatapuram
King's College London
Abstract
Situating medical and scientific research within a framework or theory of social justice is long overdue. Attempting to extend principles of research ethics beyond the clinic and lab to other affected people or consequences tolerates or obfuscates injustice. While it must be done, the timescales, methodologies, and commitment to real-world impact are quite different in research ethics versus political philosophy.
Keywords bioethics  health equity  health justice  research ethics  social justice
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1002/hast.1197
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Social Risks of Science.Jonathan Herington & Scott Tanona - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (6):27-38.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Health Equity and Social Justice.Fabienne Peter - 2001 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):159–170.
Health and Social Justice. [REVIEW]S. Venkatapuram - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (2):186-188.
Public Health, Ethics, and Equity.Sudhir Anand (ed.) - 2004 - Oxford University Press UK.
When Are Health Inequalities Unfair?Gry Wester - 2018 - Public Health Ethics 11 (3):346-355.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-12-15

Total views
2 ( #1,452,859 of 2,518,147 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,147 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes