Daniel and Enoch: Two different reactions
HTS Theological Studies 53 (1/2) (1997)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Wishful Thinking in Moral Theorizing: Comment on Enoch.Rob van Someren Greve - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (4):447-450.
The Book of Enoch or I Enoch: A New English Edition.S. A. K. & Matthew Black - 1990 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 110 (1):161.
The son of man in Daniel, Enoch and the Gospels.T. W. Manson - 1949 - Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 32 (1):1-17.
Getting by with a little help from our friends.Enoch Lambert & Daniel C. Dennett - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
“the Son Of Man In Daniel, Enoch And The Gospels,”.T. W. Manson - 1950 - Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 32 (2):171-193.
Enoch’s “Taking-Morality-Seriously Thought” Unpacked and at Work in the Argument from Impartiality.Giuliana Mancuso - 2018 - Topoi 37 (4):591-602.
Enoch’s Defense of Robust Meta-Ethical Realism.Gunnar Björnsson & Ragnar Francén Olinder - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (1):101–112.
While on the subject of closure….Daniel Brandeis & Enoch Callaway - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (3):377.
Thinking like animals or thinking like colleagues?Daniel C. Dennett & Enoch Lambert - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Theory and Practice: J. Enoch Powell.J. Enoch Powell - 1989 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 26:1-9.
Disagreeing about how to disagree.Kate Manne & David Sobel - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (3):823-34.
Why General Jurisprudence is Interesting.Julie Dickson - 2018 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 49 (147):11-39.
The Books of Enoch: Aramaic Fragments of Qumr'n Cave 4The Books of Enoch: Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4.James VanderKam & J. T. Milik - 1980 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 100 (3):360.
Obscenity reactions: Toward a symbolic interactionist explanation.William H. Foddy - 1981 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (2):125–146.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-07-25
Downloads
9 (#937,893)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2018-07-25
Downloads
9 (#937,893)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Pieter M. Venter’s contribution to Old Testament Studies – an appreciation.Wouter C. van Wyk - 2014 - HTS Theological Studies 70 (3):01-05.
