Reply to Gillett

Philosophical Psychology 5 (2):181 – 182 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This reply appeared in a symposium on "Consciousness and the Physical World" published in Philosophical Psychology in 1992.This was the first symposium on Velmans' Reflexive Model of Perception (the departure point for Reflexive Monism) initially presented in "Consciousness, Brain and the Physical World" (1990) also in Philosophical Psychology. The symposium begins with Velmans' summary of the main arguments in that paper, followed by critiques from two psychologists--Robert Rentoul and Norman Wetherick. Velmans replies to the critiques and the entire treatment is further critiqued by the philosopher Grant Gillett, followed by Velmans' final reply. At the time of this upload (25 years later) many of the points in the original paper have become common currency, however some of the confusions about the implications of the reflexive model persist, so the discussion continues to have contemporary relevance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Metaphysics and medical ethics: a reply.G. Gillett - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (1):50-52.
Reply to Brody: `The pause' and killing.G. Gillett - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (1):46-47.
Reply to J M Stanley: fiddling and clarity.G. Gillett - 1987 - Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (1):23-25.
Realization and the metaphysics of mind.Thomas W. Polger - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):233 – 259.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-07

Downloads
19 (#753,814)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Max Velmans
Goldsmiths College, University of London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Is the mind conscious, functional, or both?Max Velmans - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):629-630.

Add more references