How to endure

Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):37 - 57 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The terms `endurance' and `perdurance' are commonly thought to denote distinct ways for an object to persist, but it is surprisingly hard to say what these are. The common approach, defining them in terms of temporal parts, is mistaken, because it does not lead to two coherent philosophical alternatives: endurance so understood becomes conceptually incoherent, while perdurance becomes not just true but a conceptual truth. Instead, we propose a different way to articulate the distinction, in terms of identity rather than temporal parts: an object endures if its identity is determined at every moment at which it exists. We make precise what it means for the identity of an object to be determined at a moment. We also discuss what role the endurance / perdurance distinction, so understood, should play in the debates about time, material objects and personal identity

Similar books and articles

An epistemic argument for enduring human persons.Gary Rosenkrantz - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):209-224.
Persistence and presentism.Dean W. Zimmerman - 1996 - Philosophical Papers 25 (2):115-126.
Endurance, psychological continuity, and the importance of personal identity.Trenton Merricks - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):983-997.
The 3d/4d controversy and non-present objects.Ned Markosian - 1994 - Philosophical Papers 23 (3):243-249.
Persistence and location in relativistic spacetime.Cody Gilmore - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (6):1224-1254.
On the Persistence of Particles.Jeremy Butterfield - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 35 (2):233-269.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
724 (#20,153)

6 months
84 (#44,707)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Thomas Hofweber
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
J. David Velleman
New York University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references