Debunking Corporate Moral Responsibility
Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4):531-562 (2003)
Abstract
I address three topics. First, I argue that the issue of corporate moral responsibility is an important one for business ethics.Second, I examine a core argument for the claim that the corporate organization is a separate moral agent and show it is based on anunnoticed but elementary mistake deriving from the fallacy of division. Third, I examine the assumptions collectivists make about whatit means to say that organizations act and that they act intentionally and show that these assumptions are mistaken in their failure to understand the nature of intentional causality and of “as-if” intentionality. In exposing these mistakes I set out my own view in the form oftwo theses, the first of which states that individual members of an organization are always causally responsible for any corporate act,and the second of which states that attributions of intentions to corporations are always either descriptive or prescriptive attributionsof “as if” intentionalityISBN(s)
1052-150X
DOI
10.5840/beq200313436
My notes
Similar books and articles
Corporate responsibility and corporate personhood.Rita C. Manning - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):77 - 84.
The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility.Jacob Dahi Rendtorff - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:111-117.
Corporate executives: Disasters and moral responsibility. [REVIEW]Robert Larmer - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (7):785 - 788.
Public relations and corporate social responsibility: Some issues arising. [REVIEW]Jacquie L'Etang - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (2):111 - 123.
Corporate moral responsibility: What can we infer from our understanding of organisations? [REVIEW]Stephen Wilmot - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):161 - 169.
A Political Account of Corporate Moral Responsibility.Jeffery Smith - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):223 - 246.
Unredistributable corporate moral responsibility.Jan Edward Garrett - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7):535 - 545.
Corporate responsibility for environmental damage.J. Angelo Corlett - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (2):195-207.
Corporate moral responsibility in health care.Stephen Wilmot - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (2):139-146.
Corporate Moral Responsibility: When it Might Matter.Michael J. Phillips - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (3):555-576.
Reflections on Corporate Moral Responsibility and the Problem Solving Technique of Alexander the Great.John Hasnas - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):183-195.
Corporate Speech as Commercial Speech: A Response to Mayer’s Nike v. Kasky Analysis.Jeffrey Nesteruk - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):97-103.
Schefflerian ethics and corporate social responsibility.J. Angelo Corlett - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (8):631 - 638.
The fiction of corporate scapegoating.P. Eddy Wilson - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (10):779 - 784.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-09
Downloads
107 (#118,146)
6 months
3 (#227,700)
2011-01-09
Downloads
107 (#118,146)
6 months
3 (#227,700)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Sweatshops, Structural Injustice, and the Wrong of Exploitation: Why Multinational Corporations Have Positive Duties to the Global Poor.Brian Berkey - 2021 - Journal of Business Ethics 169 (1):43-56.
Group Action Without Group Minds.Kenneth Silver - 2022 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 104 (2):321-342.
Corporate Character: Modern Virtue Ethics and The Virtuous Corporation.Geoff Moore - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (4):659-685.
Corporate character, corporate virtues.Geoff Moore - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (S2):99-114.
References found in this work
The Rediscovery of the Mind, by John Searle. [REVIEW]Mark William Rowe - 1992 - Philosophy 68 (265):415-418.
The Rediscovery of the Mind by John Searle. [REVIEW]Daniel C. Dennett - 1993 - Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):193-205.
What psychological states are not.Ned Block & Jerry A. Fodor - 1972 - Philosophical Review 81 (April):159-81.